LinkedIn
Facebook
X
Email

Using capital projects to promote economic development and US commercial interests : a synthesis of findings

Publication Year: 1994
Document ID: PN-AAX-294
Contract Number: N/A
Downloaded: 6
[pdf_download]
Publication Year: 1994
Document ID: PN-AAX-294
Contract Number: N/A

Share this document:

Interest on the part of U.S. exporters, the Congress, and the Executive Branch in the use of capital assistance projects to promote both economic development and U.S. commercial interests has been growing. This synthesis evaluation analyzes seven key questions to assess how and under what conditions capital projects can support both objectives, drawing on data from an examination of USAID capital projects experience along with that of U.S. exporters, the World Bank, and other donors, and from an in-depth case study of Egypt, the largest capital projects program in USAID’s portfolio. Key findings are as follows. (1) Capital projects have rarely leveraged other donor or private investor participation in USAID projects. (2) USAID capital projects have not been very successful in generating commercial follow-on sales for U.S. exporters. (3) There are examples of well-designed capital projects, operating in a favorable policy environment, providing a good economic rate of return (ERR) — but all too many have had low ERRs, due to developing country institutional and policy problems. (4) Capital projects have definitely provided important benefits to developing countries’ private sectors, and most have contributed to alleviating poverty or meeting basic needs of the poor. (5) Sustainability of capital projects depends upon appropriate host country institutional reform. (6) While the policy issues critical to the success of capital projects are well understood, it has proven difficult to use capital projects as a vehicle for policy reform. (7) Commercial concerns have not adversely affected the development impacts of USAID projects, mainly because USAID has made sure that projects first and foremost address the developmental needs of recipient countries. In general then, while capital projects are important for development, in most instances they have not helped to increase U.S. exports beyond what the projects need. However, it is unrealistic to expect aid programs to build markets in countries where economic policies restrict growth and the demand for imports; the best opportunities for U.S. exporters are in developing countries possessing a favorable policy environment and an expanding economy, such as Korea and Taiwan. For their part, U.S. exporters should focus on making sure that their products are competitive in their own right.

Authors
Lieberson, Joseph M.

Take action with I4DI’s DECipher—our advanced platform transcends basic data processing by actively learning, synthesizing, and leveraging decades of development expertise.

Completely free of charge

Type of Submission
Title / Summary *
Provide a short and clear title that summarizes the issue.
Description *
Describe the bug in detail. Please include what you expected to happen and what actually happened.
Relevant Link (optional)
Add a direct link to the page or screen where the bug occurred, if available. This helps us quickly locate and investigate the issue.
Consent & Submission Agreement *
I consent to being contacted by the I4DI team should additional information be required to better understand the issue I have reported.
Title / Summary *
Provide a short and clear title that summarizes the idea.
Description *
Describe the idea in detail.
Consent & Submission Agreement *
I consent to being contacted by the I4DI team should additional information be required to better understand the feature suggestion I have submitted.
Add Missing Document