LinkedIn
Facebook
X
Email

Process evaluation of the historically black colleges and universities research grants program

Publication Year: 1992
Document ID: PD-ABF-428
Contract Number: PDC-0085-I-00-9087-00
Downloaded: 10
[pdf_download]
Publication Year: 1992
Document ID: PD-ABF-428
Contract Number: PDC-0085-I-00-9087-00

Share this document:

External evaluation of the Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU’s) Research Grants Program covers FY84-FY91. During the period reviewed, 152 research grants were awarded to 30 HBCU’s. More than half of the grants (83) were received by only 7 of the institutions. However, the program is not designed as a cohesive research program. Grants are awarded for discrete projects, and there is no system for ensuring that new grants will build on prior research results or will be related to other ongoing grants. Such cohesion as exists appears to have been the result of the efforts of some HBCU’s and principal investigators. The overall impact of the program, from the perspective of principal investigators and research directors, has been positive. In only 8 years, a critical mass of HBCU scientists have developed expertise in international programs, and many HBCU’s have strengthened their capabilities to work with A.I.D. However, the concept underlying the program contains an inherent conflict. While the program’s stated aim is to strengthen institutions, the research grants are often the result of the efforts of one researcher, or a very small group of researchers. These researchers often obtain multiple grants, often at different HBCU’s. As long as the principal investigators remain with minority institutions, the aggregate capacity and experience of HBCU’s are increased. However, the development of the capacity of a particular institutions often is thwarted by the movement of principal investigators. No drastic changes in the program are recommended, but it is recommended that HBCU’s that have developed a critical mass of research resources (and, accordingly, can be expected to generate visible favorable results) be rewarded for their initiative by being designated centers of excellence. Prospective centers would be expected to define a focused, long-term research plan, perhaps for 5 years, and to seek funding from non-A.I.D. sources to complement A.I.D. funding. It is suggested that as a demonstration of the centers of excellence concept, grants of $200,000 annually be awarded to two such centers, one for health and one for agriculture.

Authors
Adams, Eugene W.|Berry, Dale W.|Feldman, Mona A.
Authoring Organizations

Take action with I4DI’s DECipher—our advanced platform transcends basic data processing by actively learning, synthesizing, and leveraging decades of development expertise.

Completely free of charge

Type of Submission
Title / Summary *
Provide a short and clear title that summarizes the issue.
Description *
Describe the bug in detail. Please include what you expected to happen and what actually happened.
Relevant Link (optional)
Add a direct link to the page or screen where the bug occurred, if available. This helps us quickly locate and investigate the issue.
Consent & Submission Agreement *
I consent to being contacted by the I4DI team should additional information be required to better understand the issue I have reported.
Title / Summary *
Provide a short and clear title that summarizes the idea.
Description *
Describe the idea in detail.
Consent & Submission Agreement *
I consent to being contacted by the I4DI team should additional information be required to better understand the feature suggestion I have submitted.
Add Missing Document