The format of this report was a series of questions and answers. Thus, this series of questions here are an outline of the report; the answers were much too long and complex to reproduce here. Volume III outlines the goals of the project, discusses each project year’s activities, and answers in detail thirteen ques- tions concerning its evaluation. They are: 1) What does the University of Massachusetts Non-Formal Education Project purport to do? 2) How does the University of Massachusetts NFE Project go about implementing its goals and objectives? 3) To what ex- tent is the University of Massachuestts NFE Project carrying outs its intended objectives effectively? 4) What are the learning outcomes of selected non-formal education materials developed by the University of Massachusetts NFE Project? 5) What are the characteristics of the more and less effective materials devel- oped by the University of Massachusetts NFE Project? 6) What are the characteristics of materials that work well with learners of what characteristics? What are the best matchings? 7) What facilitator/teacher variables have affected the relative effec- tiveness of various materials? 8) What are the motivational at- tributes of each of the four educational games selected for in- depth experimental analysis in the evaluation? 9) What changes in attitudes and behavior (critical consciousness) are produced by each of the selected non-formal education games? 10) What sequencing factors or prerequisities are important for the four non-formal education games? 11) What are the effects of replay frequency for each of the non-formal education games? 12) Can the University of Massachusetts NFE Project be replicated in other countries? What conditions are most necessary to ensure success? and 13) What is needed to develop effective non-formal education materials and programs in countries similar to Educador?
