Adapting consumer report"s product evaluation methods for particle removal, gravity non-electric and reverse osmosis water filters in the Indian marketplace

With the global water crisis becoming more and more severe, evaluation of HWTS technologies and products has become crucial to ensure they are used to remove impurities effectively. The goal of this thesis was to evaluate household water filters in the Indian marketplace as part of a larger research and technology evaluation to investigate the utilization and performances of different water filter models in both lab and field settings. This was achieved by comparative testing and research work done at Consumer Reports (CR) Headquarters in Yonkers, NY. This evaluation included the testing of three categories of filters: Conventional Particle Removal (cloth and mesh), Gravity Non-Electric (GNE) and Reverse Osmosis (RO) water filters. In total, 16 models were tested. The challenge water for all filter testing had these characteristics: 40 10 NTU turbidity and 1500 150mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS). When testing E.coli removal, deionized water was used as the base water and the concentration of E. coli was 105 to 106 MPN (Most Probable Number)/OOmL. The comparative testing attributes that were evaluated include: E.coli removal, turbidity removal, TDS removal, clean water flow rate, RO % recovery, and filter lifetime with the end-of-life defined as when flow rate <1 L/hr. As a result of this product evaluation, the author determined that: 1) Cloth and mesh filters had limited effectiveness in reducing contaminants; 2) GNE filters had much better performance than cloth and mesh filters, but none of them had outstanding performance; 3) RO filters were shown to be quite effective in reducing turbidity (greater than 99.5%), TDS (greater than 97%), and E.coli (greater than 99.9999%). But, they produce a large amount of wastewater (around 3/4 of the feed water) which is a huge waste of precious water and a sustainability concern especially in a water scarce region.