Agricultural policy analysis project (936-4084) -- phase II : mid-term review and assessment -- contract # DAN-4200-C-00-1086-00

The APAP II design concept was based on synergism between the following three strategies: (1) a core state-of-the-art research program; (2) providing timely policy-related TA to Missions, Bureaus and host governments; and (3) training and dissemination activities to provide information on policy reform and experiences and widely available analytical methods. The project had 5 focus areas: (a) international trade; (b) the impacts of economic adjustment programs; (c) natural resources; (d) improving policy-analysis activities; and (e) the political dynamics of agricultural policy making. In terms of strengthening agricultural policy making through TA and training provided to USAID Missions and regional Bureaus, and for the AID/W seminar series initiated over the last year, the project was well regarded among most individuals contacted. However, only some of the project's objectives relating to linkages and synergism among the strategies were wholly achieved. More attention to management details by the primary contractor could have averted inefficiencies. The implementation of a bonafide core research program has not been realized: the approach to conducting core research may need to be reassessed. The lack of a focus for agricultural policy research generates a similar lack of focus within the TA and training activities. As always, both Missions and the contractors need to be mindful of the time required to process requests for project services. Included are recommendations on improving project management, re-thinking the capacity and purpose of the core research program (including making research strategies more additive), improving dissemination activities, and more fully engaging subcontracting institutions in project activities. Suggestions for additional areas of future project emphasis include policy implementation (rather than policy dialogue), regional trade and integration, resource management and environmental quality, sector development and productivity strategies, agrarian reform and transition, and agricultural-sector commercialization, privatization, and competition. (Author abstract)