Evaluation of pilot program activities : construction of appurtenant structures on Food for Work roads, final report
Sign inUSAID. MISSION TO BANGLADESH
Presents final report (as of 8/83) on two pilot Food for Work (FW) projects aimed at building roads and related structures in Bangladesh - a Local Government Pilot (LGP) project and a CARE project.
Hallett, Dan · 1983
Abstract
Report summarizes monthly reports conducted 4-8/83 and based on site visits and staff interviews (XD-AAP-265-A,B,C,D). Both projects exhibited professionalism and flexibility in handling a seemingly endless flow of problems. The LGP project was managed at the Thana level, with Thana Technical Staff (TTS) providing engineering and primary support. Slow provision of project documentation to the Thanas, however, together with serious logistical problems, pushed many activities into the monsoon season, so that as of the 6/10 deadline only 28 of 215 targeted roads were completed, with 24 in progress; work will continue next season. Due to lack of time, many engineers used simpler and less costly designs than those in the recommended design manual. Construction was of good quality once evaluator"s suggestions regarding building techniques and frequent supervision (often impeded by lack of transportation) were adopted. It is noted that TTS supervisors failed to understand the placement of weepholes and proper excavataion procedures. The CARE program - with 19 schemes - operated mainly at the Union level, with the Thana responsible for design and oversight, and CARE providing overall technical guidance. The use of innovative administrative procedures did not cause delays - all projects were completed to the slab casting stage by 6/10. Contrary to standard practice, contractors received 25% advances for materials purchase, and all final payments were made prior to the final completion of work - practices that would have been risky if contractors had not come from within the Union. The use of low-cost designs and construction methods and of contractors and local craftsmen, together with irregular supervision by the TTS"s, resulted in structures that, while aesthetically less pleasing than in the LGP project, are adequate, although some may experience minor premature failures due to technical decision errors. Some 36 recommendations are made to improve follow-up FFW activities.
Connected topics
Classification