Opportunities and options for participatory irrigation management in Central Jordan Valley

The JVA might well build on this relationship by sharing management responsibilities for the system with users. Based on interviews with central Jordan Valley farmers, the following conclusions were drawn. (1) Farmers view the present system as inherently equitable, though they recognize there is much abuse by users. (2) The system of requests for water delivery places demands on farmers which can be burdensome or inconvenient. Most farmers would welcome not being required to confirm water delivery at a government office. (3) Technical problems inhibit the operation of the system, particularly in the DA-29, with its aging infrastructure. (4) Farmers will hesitate to participate in organization efforts unless infrastructure problems are addressed early on. (5) Irrigation assistance is needed, even though farmers believe their knowledge and experience to be adequate. Concerns about how to deal with increasingly degraded water are growing. (6) Areas of participatory management that seem promising to initiate first are distribution, scheduling, and irrigation extension. (7) The cost of water is not an issue at present, but expected higher prices beginning next year offer an opportunity for introducing conservation measures. Participatory irrigation management means joint involvement and shared responsibility by both the line agency and users in the operation of an irrigation system. Shared responsibility: recognizes that inefficient system operation is in some measure the result of users" having little or no role in resolving critical water-related issues; requires a revision of relationships, with users assuming a decisionmaking role in system operation and the government authority shifting from a management to a service-oriented role; and confirms that the government authority will continue to play a critical role in its operation, particularly in delivery, extension services, and cost recovery. The introduction of participatory irrigation management into the Jordan Valley would require a significant modification of existing operations and procedures. Three major options are offered for consideration: (1) delay any introduction of a participatory management program and keep the present system essentially intact; (2) introduce participatory irrigation management through a carefully monitored pilot project; or (3) introduce participatory irrigation management in full implementation mode. These options are presented as points on a continuum rather than as exclusive choices. Some intermediary approach might in fact be more appropriate or feasible. Consideration of whether or not to introduce participatory irrigation management will require wide vetting within and beyond the JVA. Possible next steps to carry the process forward are spelled out in conclusion. (Author abstract, modified)