Performance evaluation of the USAID Sudan transition and conflict mitigation (STCM) program in Sudan

Expectations were that the STCM program would reduce the effects and causes of instability in the rapidly shifting environment of Sudan, particularly in the north-south border/transitional areas, the Three Areas (Abyei, Blue Nile, and Southern Kordofan), during the lead up to the southern secession referendum in January 2011 and potential independence of South Sudan in July. Post-secession expectations were that the program would further mitigate tension in the border areas, as well as Darfur and Khartoum. Although STCM is mentioned throughout the report as a 'program' it is better understood as a specialized tactical tool to provide strategically targeted support to transition and conflict mitigation activities. The independent performance evaluation of STCM will assist USAID/Sudan in determining: (1) the effectiveness and appropriateness of the overall approach to conflict mitigation programming and choice of funding mechanism; (2) the degree to which the implementing partner ensured a timely and cost-effective response to emerging needs in providing peace dividends, promoting community-level reconciliation, and strengthening local capacity for conflict mitigation; and (3) lessons learned that may guide the future of USAID/Sudan's conflict mitigation programming in Sudan. Specific evaluation findings, conclusions and recommendations are provided with detailed analysis for each evaluation question. (Excerpt, modified)