USAID. MISSION TO EGYPT
Evaluates Phase III of a project to strengthen Government of Egypt (GOE) development planning and implementation, especially university-GOE cooperation in applied research on technical problems.
Charleson, W.; Wilburn, A. · 1985
Abstract
ES covers the period through 9/85 and is based on an attached mid-term evaluation (XD-AAT-125-A) based on interviews, document review, and a visit to Cairo University"s (CU"s) Development Research and Technological Planning Center (DRTPC). The project has successfully demonstrated a model for collaboration between academia and government (both Ministries and industry) in applying scientific and technical expertise to Egyptian development. CU/GOE/Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) research teams have conducted studies of potential economic importance, and the GOE"s adoption of suggested innovations has resulted in some significant cost savings. MIT contributions have generally been highly valued and helpful, although in a few cases MIT was unable to provide the assistance needed. The DRTPC research program has had an important educational impact at CU, having involved about 80 graduate students yearly, stimulated major curricula changes, and provided 26 postdoctoral fellowships to faculty. Progress has been less satisfactory in developing research management and support capabilities - e.g., in marketing DRTPC services, establishing computer and library facilities and attracting research teams in new areas. While the DRTPC has made significant progress towards diversifying funding sources, full institutional and financial viability is not achievable within the current phase. Also - although greater marketing efforts are still needed - recent overemphasis on commercializing DRTPC services has led to a shift away from long-term research of primary economic importance and toward short-term revenue generating studies. Much of USAID/E is unaware of DRTPC services and should use them more extensively. The selection of first-rate local and U.S. academic institutions has been a critical factor in project success. Action decisions are to: (1) extend the project 1 year at no additional cost to USAID/E (a recommended 5-year extension was rejected by USAID/E), obtaining LE 2 million from outside sources to meet DRTPC local costs during this year; (2) present to USAID a plan for marketing DRTPC research services; (3) obtain MIT or other assistance for marketing; and (4) increase USAID/E awareness of DRTPC resources.
Connected topics
Classification
1980USAID DEC