Evaluation of Development Associates, Inc. contract (AID/DSPE-C-0060) for paramedical, auxiliary, and community (PAC) family planning personnel training in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
Sign inAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION. INTERNATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS
Evaluates project to support training of paramedical, auxiliary, and community (PAC) family planning personnel in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Blomberg, Robert C.|Rizzo, E. Edward|Quinn, Edna B. · 1984

Abstract
Special evaluation covers the period 9/79-2/84 and is based on document review, site visits, and interviews with trainees and with personnel of Development Associates, Inc. (DA), FP agencies, and A.I.D. Despite a small staff, DA has effectively and efficiently improved the quality of FP/PAC training in the Latin America and Caribbean region. DA believes in and respects the FP organizations with which it works; it is flexible, responsive, and nonbureaucratic; it has excellent logistic and reimbursement systems; and its staff is dedicated, competent, and accessible (though overburdened). The project is not without its weaknesses, however: (1) the DA contract places undue emphasis on quantitative as opposed to qualitative training targets, resulting in programs which are ill-defined ("information giving") and/or non-standard (motivational training); (2) DA has not articulated long-term training program strategies for the countries in which it works; (3) program and budget decisionmaking have been separated, the former performed by A.I.D. field population officers (with DA help) and the latter by AID/W; (4) the project's excessively narrow focus on PAC's has been a barrier to DA in developing a coherent training plan for some agencies; in some cases, physicians who have not received project training have prevented PAC's from using their skills; and (5) needs assessments, done for the most part by client agencies (often staying within the PAC constraints, rather than taking a broader look at agency training needs) have been of variable quality. A follow-on project should: address broader organizational development goals, while continuing to emphasize training; fund a wider range of TA and training activities (including more training of private sector FP administrators); include training evaluations and follow-ups, where appropriate; and make more frequent use of external project evaluations.
Classification
USAID DEC