Evaluation of Eastern ORD rural roads project (686-0215)[, Upper Volta] : final report, volume I

Final external evaluation covers the period 1977-3/82 and is based on site visits, document review, and interviews with A.I.D. and Government of Upper Volta (GOUV) personnel and other concerned officials. Of three roads (159 km) to be completed by 9/79, only one was built (39 km), begun in 3/80 and now 95% complete at tripled cost per km ($17,300 planned vs. $53,100 actual). Principal causes of the cost and time overruns were a failure to secure competent TA; poor management; slow, inefficient procurement; poor maintenance and use of equipment; questionable construction quality; upgraded design without corresponding cost estimate changes; and the need to rebuild drainage structures and roadway after new road sections had washed out due to inadequate and improperly located drains. Nevertheless, despite its excessive cost and questionable quality, the road has markedly improved area residents' quality of life through increased supplies and regular truck delivery. The project design miscalculated the amount of work needed, earthwork production rates, the appropriate equipment mix, and the time frame for implementation. Construction funds were underprescribed. Two options for a follow-on project are presented: (1) construction by local private contractors, with Travaux Publics (TP) providing technical and engineering supervision and USAID/W providing short-term TA (road design engineer, construction superintendent, mechanic advisor); (2) construction by a brigade under TP supervision with management control by a U.S. firm able to train Voltaic counterparts (force account option). The former approach has worked successfully in Upper Volta for other donors. Modifications proposed for better project management include: inventory/control systems for fuel, construction materials, and spare parts; recruitment of local personnel for road crews; and improved facilities for equipment maintenance and spare parts storage. USAID/W should provide more TA to help the GOUV to prepare plans, specifications, and schedules. If the force account method is used, design, construction, and equipment advisors and a procurement/inventory specialist should be added. Stronger GOUV commitment to road maintenance is needed.