USAID DEC
The Center for Energy Efficient Technologies (CEET) was established at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (PNU) in Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, under a Cooperative Agreement #121-A-00-08-00703-00 initiated on June 19, 2008, by CRDF Global.
2012 · 63 pages

Abstract
The goal of CEET was to conduct research on energy efficient technologies to international standards using equipment and materials purchased with Global Development Alliance (GDA) funds. CEET allowed established researchers, as well as graduate and undergraduate students, to conduct research on energy efficient technologies. During the course of the GDA, CRDF Global accomplished several activities, including holding an open competition to select the Center, organizing a ribbon cutting ceremony for CEET, training CEET and PNU personnel in financial management, and authorizing CEET to purchase new equipment to upgrade their laboratories. CEET received and put into service new equipment and supplies, including a Derivatograph, a Pore Size Analyzer, a Radiation Source for the Mössbauer Spectrometer, a Spectrophotometer, a Drying Furnace, and an Electronic Balance. The Center trained 52 students on the new equipment and introduced 16 new courses. CEET also published 13 new textbooks and educational materials, initiated 36 new research projects, published 89 articles in research journals, and received four patents. By most of the quantitative indicators, CEET may be considered a success. The percentage of female students participating in CEET remained nearly constant at 46-51% throughout the three-year grant period, with numbers of both male and female students approximately doubling. The number of female faculty members also doubled from 5 to 10 while the number of male faculty grew only slightly from 25 to 28. Meetings with students during site visits revealed that the female students were more likely to be outspokenly ambitious, which bodes positively for continued female advancement in this Center. Another area of notable success is the degree to which students and young researchers authored scientific publications. The number of students included as co-authors increased markedly during the course of the project, as did the number of young investigators publishing scientific articles as the primary author. Since an important goal of CEET was to empower early-career scientists to do independent research, this indicator is a direct measure of attainment of this goal. The record of CEET in establishing and benefitting from collaborations is somewhat mixed. CEET reported a large number of new collaborations with Ukrainian collaborators, and reported a significant number of research publications co-authored with these collaborators. CEET also reported establishing collaborations with nine international research groups, but these interactions yielded a disappointingly small number of jointly-authored papers, suggesting that the level of joint work was not as robust as with other Ukrainian colleagues. The biggest obstacle to success involved the promised cost-share from the Ministry of Education, Science, Youth and Sport of Ukraine (MESU). Funding from this source to CEET was chronically delayed and sometimes unpredictable restrictions were imposed on its use. The situation worsened following a change of leadership at MESU in early 2010 and the creation of the State Agency on Science, Innovation and Informatization of Ukraine, which led to protracted confusion over which entity had responsibility for the CREST program. The selection procedure for the CEET host university involved an open competition to select the Center, which included external review and site visits to multiple Ukrainian universities and extensive coordination with the Ministry of Ukraine for Education and Science (MESU). The research and educational achievements of CEET included the receipt and installation of new equipment, training of students on the new equipment, introduction of new courses, publication of new textbooks and educational materials, initiation of new research projects, and publication of articles in research journals. The monitoring and evaluation activities of CRDF Global included site visits to CEET, approval of personnel changes, payment requests, and periodic reports. CRDF Global also managed CEET's progress, which included approving personnel changes, payment requests, and periodic reports. The narrative that follows describes the selection procedure for the CEET host university, the research and educational achievements of CEET, and the monitoring and evaluation activities of CRDF Global. Numerical indicators are then presented with brief descriptions, and a discussion of lessons learned and suggestions for further work is provided.
Connected topics
Classification
USAID DEC