USAID
Behavioral counseling (BC) interventions aim to reduce the frequency of high-risk behaviors that lead to HIV transmission, including sexual risk behaviors.
2013 · 5 pages

Abstract
These programs generally involve client-centered interactions that provide individualized risk reduction education and behavioral counseling strategies. A systematic review focused on interventions that include an interactive session(s) led by a trained counselor with a client(s) that is "client-centered" and specifically focuses on HIV risk behaviors. The review included 29 studies, with 19 conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, 8 in East and Southeast Asia, 1 in Central Asia, and 1 in Latin America. The studies evaluated the effectiveness of BC interventions on HIV sexual risk behaviors and biological outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. The review defined BC as an interactive session(s) led by a trained counselor with a client(s) that is "client-centered" and specifically focuses on HIV risk behaviors. The results of the review indicate that BC alone may not be effective for reducing HIV risk behaviors in certain groups, including People Living with HIV (PLHIV), people who use drugs or alcohol, and individuals at high risk for HIV infection. While some studies showed positive effects of BC on behavioral outcomes, the rigorously designed studies largely showed a lack of or very modest positive findings on behavioral outcomes most closely associated with risk for HIV infection. However, BC may still be a valuable component of a combination HIV prevention program. A comprehensive approach covering a range of intervention modalities is necessary for prevention in PLHIV, and BC may be one of the interventions included in this approach. Similarly, individuals at high risk for HIV infection may require a more comprehensive approach to prevention, and BC may be one of the interventions included in this approach. The quality of studies varied across target groups, precluding strong conclusions about the efficacy of BC for some groups. Specifically, the studies of BC for both serodiscordant couples and individuals with moderate to low risk for HIV were few in number and were not rigorously designed. Additional research with these groups is warranted. The review highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to HIV prevention, including both biomedical and behavioral interventions. BC may be one of the interventions included in this approach, but its effectiveness may vary depending on the target group and the specific context. Further research is needed to determine the most effective combination of interventions for different populations and settings. The findings of the review have implications for the implementation of BC as part of a prevention program. While BC may not be effective alone for reducing HIV risk behaviors in certain groups, it may still be a valuable component of a combination HIV prevention program. A comprehensive approach covering a range of intervention modalities is necessary for prevention, and BC may be one of the interventions included in this approach. The review also highlights the importance of rigorous study design and evaluation in determining the effectiveness of BC interventions. The studies included in the review were rigorously designed, and the results provide a clear picture of the effectiveness of BC interventions in reducing HIV risk behaviors. However, the quality of studies varied across target groups, precluding strong conclusions about the efficacy of BC for some groups. In conclusion, the review provides a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness of BC interventions in reducing HIV risk behaviors in low- and middle-income countries. While BC may not be effective alone for reducing HIV risk behaviors in certain groups, it may still be a valuable component of a combination HIV prevention program. Further research is needed to determine the most effective combination of interventions for different populations and settings.
Connected topics
Classification
USAID DEC