short-run public reactions to food subsidy cuts in selected sub-Saharan and North African countries
Sign inOVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (ODC)
Fear of public disturbances often constrains LDC governments from following demands made by the International Monetary Fund and other lenders to reduce or eliminate subsidies on food staples by increasing consumer prices.
Nelson, Joan M. · 1985

Abstract
This study examines the effects of nominal consumer price increases in four African countries - Morocco, Tunisia, Senegal, and Madagascar - to determine the short-term causes of such disturbances. Of 13 increases in food grain prices studied, only two prompted serious rioting and death - Morocco in 6/81 and Tunisia in 1/84. Rioting also occurred in Morocco in 1/84 due to rumors of a grain price increase, plus actual price increases for other staples. In the other cases, there was little or no public disturbance. The study concludes, inter alia, that: large-scale violence is unusual; "pocket book" impact is only one factor; the population may view price hikes as part of a general inflationary trend; availability of substitute staples at competitive prices is not likely to dampen public reaction; organized opposition only plays a minor role in unrest, which is usually spontaneous; measures believed to be equitable and part of a plausible economic recovery plan are less likely to set off protest; government legitimacy affects the probability of unrest; and security forces can effectively deter organized, but not spontaneous, unrest.
Connected topics
Classification