ACDI/VOCA
The Field Office Assessment in Tanzania was conducted from December 3rd to 7th, 2012.
2012 · 29 pages

Abstract
The assessment focused on the NAFAKA project, which is a USAID-funded initiative. The project's objective is to improve agricultural productivity and food security in Tanzania. The assessment covered various aspects of the project, including compliance, procurement, grants administration, and personnel management. The assessment team reviewed grant files, procurement plans, and personnel records to ensure compliance with USAID regulations and ACDI/VOCA policies. The team also met with project staff, including the Chief of Party, to discuss project implementation and progress. The assessment identified several areas for improvement, including the need for a more comprehensive procurement plan, better tracking of grant administration, and enhanced personnel management practices. The team also noted that the project had made progress in implementing new procurement procedures and had improved its compliance with USAID regulations. The assessment team recommended several actions to address the identified areas for improvement. These included completing the procurement plan, updating grant administration files, and revising personnel management practices. The team also suggested that the project conduct a debriefing with HQ staff on grants and subcontracts planning. The assessment also covered other aspects of the project, including security, HQ support and communications, and personnel management. The team noted that the project had taken steps to improve security, including the display of a hotline for emergencies poster and the implementation of a security manual. However, the team also identified areas for improvement, including the need for a more comprehensive security plan and better communication between the project and HQ staff. The assessment team also reviewed the project's financial, grants, and programmatic reviews. The team noted that the project had made progress in implementing its annual workplan budget and had improved its tracking of M&E data. However, the team also identified areas for improvement, including the need for a more comprehensive deliverables tracker and better communication with the client. Overall, the assessment identified several areas for improvement, but also noted that the project had made progress in implementing new procedures and improving its compliance with USAID regulations. The assessment team recommended several actions to address the identified areas for improvement and suggested that the project conduct a debriefing with HQ staff on grants and subcontracts planning. The assessment team also noted that the project had several challenges, including the need for a more comprehensive procurement plan, better tracking of grant administration, and enhanced personnel management practices. However, the team also identified several strengths, including the project's commitment to improving agricultural productivity and food security in Tanzania. The assessment team recommended that the project continue to work on improving its compliance with USAID regulations and ACDI/VOCA policies. The team also suggested that the project conduct regular reviews and assessments to ensure that it is meeting its objectives and making progress towards its goals. The assessment team also noted that the project had several opportunities for growth and development, including the potential to expand its reach and impact in Tanzania. The team recommended that the project explore these opportunities and develop a plan to address them. Overall, the assessment provided a comprehensive review of the NAFAKA project and identified several areas for improvement. The assessment team recommended several actions to address the identified areas for improvement and suggested that the project conduct a debriefing with HQ staff on grants and subcontracts planning.
Connected topics
Classification