UN fund for population activities

Report, submitted in the form of a special PES, covers the period 1/78-12/80 and is based on a survey of 68 U.S. Embassies and Missions. Of 48 survey respondents, 47 indicated that a continuing UNFPA role is important to the achievement of U.S. foreign policy objectives. More than 90% of respondents judged UNFPA programs to be effective in providing requested assistance and consistent with U.S. population strategy. Inadequate resources were identified as an increasingly severe constraint on UNFPA programs. Although some communication gaps between A.I.D. and UNFPA are apparent, the two organizations generally coordinate programs effectively. Sharp differences exist in the allocation of UNFPA assistance between A.I.D. regions both geographically and by purpose; however, these differences are consistent with U.S. interests. Expected reductions in UNFPA"s support for inter-country programs will jeopardize its capacity to meet priority assistance needs. UNFPA support for family planning programs is shaped by host country policies which in many cases mandate the provision of assistance for health activities unrelated to family planning. In light of these findings, it is recommended: that the U.S. Government continue financial support for UNFPA and encourage and support A.I.D.-UNFPA program coordination at all levels; and that the establishment of a process for continuing U.S. review of UNFPA activities be a condition for continued U.S. support. In regard to the next session of UNFPA"s Governing Council, the U.S. position should emphasize that: UNFPA should channel a larger proportion of its resources to family planning programs; future funding decisions take into account differences between the assistance needs of different geographic regions; and care be exercised in selecting inter-country programs in light of reduced UNFPA support.