Electoral Assessment Framework: A Companion Toolkit for Assessment Teams

The framework is intended to help USAID DRG officers and other relevant USG personnel assess and prioritize the challenges in the sector, and then develop a strategy to identify the best program options to promote credible elections. The framework involves four steps: (1) assessing the country context; (2) assessing the electoral context; (3) defining objectives and developing an elections and political processes assistance strategy; and (4) identifying priority programs. The country context assessment examines the key political, foundational, and conflict-related factors that can impact opportunities and create risks to credible elections. This includes assessing the regime type and political system, foundational factors, regional political dynamics and foreign actors, and the conflict and security environment. Assessing the regime type and political system provides insight into the country's overall commitment to holding genuine elections, as well as the status of the core democratic principles and freedoms that provide a foundation for credible elections. This involves examining power dynamics, identifying key actors, and assessing their commitment or opposition to democratic reforms, as well as their capacity to implement or influence changes. Foundational factors, such as economic, cultural, demographic, historical, and social considerations, are slow to change or fix and provide insight into how a country's power structures, social and historical alignments, cleavages, and alliances influence political culture and norms. This can illuminate areas of opportunity and risk for promoting credible and inclusive elections. Regional political dynamics and foreign actors are also assessed, including regional political trends, the history of relations between neighboring countries, and key regional developments that may affect the elections. The motivations and actions of malign foreign actors, who have become increasingly involved in influencing elections and political transitions through disinformation campaigns, cyber attacks, fake election observers, and support for illiberal political actors, are also assessed. The conflict and security environment is analyzed to determine how it is likely to impact the electoral process. This includes assessing the dynamics of conflict and how they may affect the electoral process, as well as the potential for violence and instability during the election period. The electoral context assessment examines the legal framework and electoral reform, election management, political parties and candidates, voter education, election observation, media ecosystem, electoral security and conflict, electoral justice, and post-election transitions. This assessment provides insight into the country's electoral system, the role of key stakeholders, and the potential for electoral irregularities and violence. The framework provides a checklist of key questions that can be used to guide the assessment of each topic, and the four steps include the following: Step 1: Assess the Country Context; Step 2: Assess the Electoral Context; Step 3: Define Objectives and Develop an Elections and Political Processes Assistance Strategy; and Step 4: Identify Priority Programs. The Electoral Assessment Framework is intended to assist USAID DRG officers and other relevant USG personnel in assessing and prioritizing the challenges in the electoral sector, and then developing a strategy to identify the best program options to promote credible elections. The framework is a tool to help prioritize the investment of US taxpayer dollars and align assistance strategies with diplomatic strategies.