Summary Report on Re-training, Monitoring, Evaluation and Follow-up Visit Conducted in Mwanza and Dodoma Regions
Sign inINTRAHEALTH
The re-training, monitoring, evaluation, and follow-up visit conducted in Mwanza and Dodoma regions in November-December 2011 aimed to enhance the skills of District Advocacy Teams (DAT) in advocating for Most Vulnerable Children (MVC) programs.
2011 · 21 pages

Abstract
The training focused on monitoring and evaluation, data collection, and reporting tools. The training was conducted for three days, with participants from Mwanza and Dodoma regions. In Mwanza, 42 District Officials from 7 District councils, 1 RSWO, 1 representative from NGO network, and 7 PASONET district leaders participated. In Dodoma, 36 District Officials from 6 District councils, 1 RSWO, 1 representative from NGO network, and 6 PASONET district leaders participated. The training covered various topics, including the importance of information and data, the MVC program and M&E system, and joint follow-up visit methodology. Participants were introduced to data collection tools, such as the Standard Process Evaluation Data Collection Tool for PSWs and a questionnaire for in-depth interviews with village/ward leaders. The teams were also oriented on reporting tools, including monthly and quarterly reporting tools. During the training, participants were given the opportunity to practice using the data collection tools through role-plays. After the training, a joint follow-up visit was conducted in Mwanza City, Geita, and Sengerema, where DAT members were involved in data collection and feedback processes. The follow-up visit team consisted of Nora Kaaya from IntraHealth, Zena Amury from IntraHealth, Mwanza District Advocacy Team Members, Dodoma District Advocacy Team Members, Regional Social Welfare Officers from Mwanza and Dodoma, and PASONET representatives from each district in Mwanza and Dodoma. The follow-up visit was conducted in 21 wards in Mwanza City, Geita, and Sengerema, and 17 wards in Dodoma, Kongwa, Chamwino, and Bahi districts. A total of 78 PSWs were interviewed, with 60 in Mwanza and 18 in Dodoma. The follow-up teams observed several key achievements, including the establishment of District Advocacy Teams (DAT) in all three districts visited. However, there was no consistent follow-up monitoring and mentoring of Para Social Workers (PSWs) by leaders and supervisors from the ward and district levels. The teams also noted that each supervisor had their own modality of supervision, which affected the provision of care and support to MVCs. The training and follow-up visit aimed to enhance the skills of DAT members in advocating for MVC programs and to improve the quality of services provided to MVCs. However, the lack of consistent follow-up monitoring and mentoring of PSWs remains a challenge that needs to be addressed.
Connected topics
Classification
USAID DEC